Why do we have the idea of God at all? Not just a really powerful being, but a perfect and infinite one? If that idea lives in your mind, where did it come from?
Renown 17th century philosopher Renee Descartes wondered this same thing. After pondering the question he had a burst of insight. He argued that ideas need causes, and the cause has to be at least as “big” as the content of the idea. If I have the idea of a triangle, it can come from seeing shapes, doing geometry, or combining things I already know. If I have the idea of the sun, I can point to the sky. But the idea of a perfect, infinite God is different. We are finite. We fail. We do not have perfection inside ourselves to copy. So how did a limited mind produce an idea that outruns everything it has ever met?
Descartes said the cause must match or exceed the effect. A small fire cannot cause a giant plume of smoke. In the same way, a finite cause cannot generate the positive content of an infinite, perfect being. The best explanation is that God Himself placed that idea in us like a maker’s mark, the way a signet ring leaves its seal in wax. We all carry an idea of a being with every perfection. A finite source cannot produce that out of nothing. So the most reasonable origin of the idea of God is the real God.
A kid can dream up a purple horse because he already knows purple and horses. That is mixing parts. Try to build “infinite perfection” out of parts. You will notice you are not just stacking pieces. You are reaching for something that surpasses every piece. That reach is the signal. It points back to an infinite cause.
Common objections and replies
Objection 1. “People imagine things that do not exist all the time, like unicorns.”
Rebuttal 1. Unicorns are composites of parts we already know, horse plus horn. The idea of God is not a collage. It is the single notion of a perfect and infinite source. A finite mind can remix parts. It cannot originate the positive content of infinity and absolute perfection.
Objection 2. “Culture taught me “God,” so that explains the origin.”
Rebuttal 2. Culture can pass along a word and a story, like a chain of photocopies. That does not explain the first high resolution original. A copied seal still needs an original seal. The content of the idea still calls for a cause equal to it.
Objection 3. “Maybe the mind just takes good qualities and pushes them to the limit, turning strong into strongest and smart into smartest.”
Rebuttal 3. Pushing to the limit still smuggles in the very thing at issue, real infinity and real perfection. No one has a lived example of those, and simply removing limits is not the same as the positive reality of a perfect, necessary being. The cleaner explanation is that the cause of the idea actually contains those perfections in reality.
Final Thoughts
If you honestly find that you carry the idea of a perfect, infinite God, and if causes must be at least as great as their effects, then the most rational origin of that idea is God Himself. This does not finish the whole case, but it adds a strong plank to the bridge.
Ready for the next lesson? CLICK HERE